It's an understandable impulse. But if your images are wider than about 100px (banners aside), they're quietly working against you - in two pretty significant ways.
First: The Modern Aesthetic Problem
Cast an eye over the email signatures of leading design agencies, tech companies, and modern consultancies. What do you notice? They're minimal. Clean. Often just a small logo mark - tight, considered, and refined.
Contemporary signature design follows the same principles as good UI design: whitespace is your friend, restraint signals confidence, and clutter signals noise. A large image, say, a logo sitting at 250px wide, dominates the signature block visually. It competes with your name, your title, your contact details. Instead of supporting the message, it becomes the message.
Small logos (typically 60–100px wide) behave more like punctuation. They anchor the signature without shouting. They say this is professional without needing to say anything at all. Brands that understand this tend to feel more polished and trustworthy, not despite using a smaller image, but because of it.
A confident brand whispers. An insecure one shouts.









